Background: The role of tracheostomy in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unclear, with several consensus guidelines advising against this practice. We developed both a dedicated airway team and coordinated education programme to facilitate ward management of tracheostomised COVID-19 patients. Here, we report outcomes in the first 100 COVID-19 patients who underwent tracheostomy at our institution. Methods: This was a prospective observational cohort study of patients confirmed to have COVID-19 who required mechanical ventilation at Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK. The primary outcome measure was 30-day survival, accounting for severe organ dysfunction (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health [APACHE]-II score>17). Secondary outcomes included duration of ventilation, ICU stay, and healthcare workers directly involved in tracheostomy care acquiring COVID-19. Results: A total of 164 patients with COVID-19 were admitted to the ICU between March 9, 2020 and April 21, 2020. A total of 100 patients (mean [standard deviation] age: 55 [12] yr; 29% female) underwent tracheostomy; 64 (age: 57 [14] yr; 25% female) did not undergo tracheostomy. Despite similar APACHE-II scores, 30-day survival was higher in 85/100 (85%) patients after tracheostomy, compared with 27/64 (42%) non-tracheostomised patients {relative risk: 3.9 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 2.3e6.4); P<0.0001}. In patients with APACHE-II scores !17, 68/100 (68%) tracheotomised patients survived, compared with 12/64 (19%) non-tracheotomised patients (P<0.001). Tracheostomy within 14 days of intubation was associated with shorter duration of ventilation (mean difference: 6.0 days [95% CI: 3.1e9.0]; P<0.0001) and ICU stay (mean difference: 6.7 days [95% CI: 3.7e9.6]; P<0.0001). No healthcare workers developed COVID-19. Conclusion: Independent of the severity of critical illness from COVID-19, 30-day survival was higher and ICU stay shorter in patients receiving tracheostomy. Early tracheostomy appears to be safe in COVID-19.

BackgroundThere is a paucity of data comparing effectiveness of various techniques for pain management of traumatic rib fractures. This study compared the quality of analgesia provided by serratus anterior plane (SAP) catheters against thoracic epidural (TEA) or paravertebral catheters (PA) in patients with multiple traumatic rib fractures (MRFs).Methods354 patients who received either SAP, TEA or PA at two tertiary referral major trauma centers in the UK were included (2016–2018). Primary outcome were change in inspiratory volumes and pain scores. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, along with the length of stay in hospital and critical care. Data were analyzed using linear, log-binomial and negative binomial regression models.Main resultsAcross all blocks, there was a mean (SD) increase in inspiratory volume postblock of 789.4 mL (479.7). Ninety-eight per cent of all participants reported moderate/severe pain prior to regional analgesia, which was reduced to 34% postblock. There was no significant difference in the change in inspiratory volume or pain scores between the TEA, PA or SAP groups. Overall crude mortality was 13.2% (95% CI 7.8% to 18.7%). In an adjusted analysis and compared with TEA, in-hospital mortality was similar between groups (relative risk (RR) 0.4, 95% CI 0.1 to 1.0) and (RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2 to 1.6) for SAP and PA, respectively.ConclusionSAP, TEA and PA all appear to offer the ability to reduce pain scores and improve respiratory function.

SummaryThe practice of checking the ability to mask ventilate before administering neuromuscular blocking drugs remains controversial. We prospectively evaluated the changes in the expired tidal volume during pressure-controlled ventilation (two-handed mask ventilation technique) as a surrogate marker to assess the ease of mask ventilation following administration of rocuronium. After informed consent, 125 patients were anaesthetised using a standard induction technique consisting of fentanyl, propofol and rocuronium, with anaesthesia then maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. The mean (SD) expired tidal volume before administration of rocuronium increased by 61 (13) ml at 2 min following onset of neuromuscular block (p < 0.001). This supports the concept that neuromuscular blockade induced by rocuronium facilitates mask ventilation.

Aerosolised salbutamol does not improve clinical outcomes in patients with acute lung injury. Level of evidence: 1B (Individual RCT with a wide confidence interval)

Lead author: Malcie Mesnil Three part clinical question: Patients: Adult (18-80 years) patients weighing between 50-120 kg requiring more than 24 hours sedation. Intervention: Sedation with sevoflurane, propofol, or midazolam. Outcome: The primary endpoints were: wake-up times, extubation delay from termination of sedation administration. The secondary endpoints were: proportion of time within Ramsey Sedation Score 3-4, IV morphine consumption at 24 hours post extubation, hallucination episodes after the end of sedation, renal and hepatic consequences, and plasma fluoride concentration. The study design: Non-blinded, randomised controlled trial.