Non-Cash Food Assistance (BPNT) aims to reduce the burden of public spending in meeting basic needs. However, there are some problems with distribution. This research focuses on indicators of the effectiveness of the distribution of the BPNT assistance program, namely target accuracy, choice accuracy, and timeliness, as well as the benefits of the BPNT program for the community. This study uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive method. The types of data used are primary and secondary data. Data collection techniques through observation, interviews and documentation. The results of the study illustrate that the effectiveness of the distribution of non-cash food assistance in Bireuen Regency has not been fully running well because BPNT recipients are not on target. Meanwhile, KPM is not given the freedom to choose aid materials according to their needs, so it is not the right choice. In addition, the schedule for assisting is still not following the provisions so that it is not on time. The benefits of the program can be directly felt by the poor in improving food security and improving the economy for SMEs (e-Warung). Overall, the distribution of Non-Cash Food Assistance (BPNT) to KPM is still less effective. ABSTRAKBantuan Pangan Non Tunai (BPNT) bertujuan mengurangi beban pengeluaran masyarakat dalam pemenuhan kebutuhan pokok. Namun dalam penyaluran terdapat beberapa permasalahan. Penelitan ini berfokus pada indikator efektivitas penyaluran program bantuan BPNT yaitu ketepatan sasaran, ketepatan pilihan, dan ketepatan waktu, serta manfaat program BPNT bagi masyarakat. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode deskriptif. Jenis data yang digunakan adalah data primer dan sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data melalui observasi, wawancara dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menggambarkan bahwa efektivitas penyaluran bantuan pangan non tunai di Kabupaten Bireuen belum sepenuhnya berjalan dengan baik karena penerima BPNT tidak tepat sasaran. Sementara KPM tidak diberikan kebebasan dalam pemilihan bahan bantuan sesuai dengan kebutuhan sehingga tidak tepat pilihan. Selain itu, jadwal pemberian bantuan masih belum sesuai dengan ketentuan sehingga tidak tepat waktu. Adapun manfaat program langsung dapat dirasakan oleh masyarakat kurang mampu dalam meningkatkan ketahanan pangan dan meningkatkan ekonomi bagi pelaku UKM (e-Warung). Secara keseluruhan penyaluran Bantuan Pangan Non Tunai (BPNT) kepada KPM masih kurang efektif.
Purpose -This study aimed to explore what the Islamic boarding school does to protect their students from radicalism, violence, and fundamentalism.Approach -For this research, both a qualitative approach and a phenomenological method were used to get the accurate results.Findings -The study was conducted from April 2016 to December 2016. The Islamic Boarding School of Jabal Nur was taken up as a case for this study. The school has a lot of strategies to protect its students from radicalism, violence, and fundamentalism ideology. Those ideologies might damage their health mental and behavior. This research found that the strategies are: (1) applying the curriculum of the study according to the Ministry of Religious Affairs (Kementerian Agama); (2) religious education based on the salafi method (al kitab alasfar) which contains the deradicalization concept, and by this method, the students were trained to be a obedient; (3) foster care system or parenting done for 24 hours. The tutor was responsible for paying
This study examines the dimensions of Collaborative Governance in minimizing the Covid-19 pandemic. This research uses a qualitative approach with data collection techniques through interviews, observations, and documentation. While the data analysis technique used is an interactive analysis model. The results showed that: 1) Collaborative Governance like Minimizing the Covid-19 Pandemic has not been fully implemented. 2) lack of community participation in health protocols. 3) violation of commitments. 4) the obstacle to minimizing the Covid-19 pandemic is in the factor of collaboration between the government and the private sector and the public which has not been open to the public.
This article argues that a number of Western orientalists tried to impress that Islam and the West could not meet, imaged that all the Islamic ones seemed to be unable to meet all the nuances of the West, as all the western images imaged always contradict Islam. Such tensions continue to this day. Towards the end of the 20th century, Islamism or Islamic fundamentalism has retreated or failed in maintaining political power in the Islamic world. But the enforcement of Shari'ah in society, remains a central theme of the demands of these Islamic fundamentalists. Thus, their target as a group is no longer just a country, but also a society. The political experiments of Islam, however, as shown in Algeria, Sudan, Iran and Afghanistan have failed and are out of date, but anyway, by the beginning of the 21st century Islamism or Islamic fundamentalism has been revived, marked by the WTC bomb 9/11 and other terror attacks in Indonesia, Europe, the US etc.
This article argues that the Indonesian people will never forget the services and roles of Egypt, the country that first recognized Indonesian independence. History recorded that the first recognition of the sovereignty of Indonesia is not done by Western countries, especially the United States who often claim him as a promoter of freedom and human rights (human rights). Indonesia's struggle for independence is supported firstly and heroically by the Muslim countries in the Arab, not others because of the spiritual-emotional relationships and civil Islam in all of the countries and nations. At that time, Arab world have felt, how strong ukhuwah Islamiyyah (Islamic solidarity and linkage) between the Indonesian people and with Arab nations who are struggling for their independence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.