2015
DOI: 10.1109/jssc.2014.2371136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 2.7 GHz to 7 GHz Fractional-N LC-PLL Utilizing Multi-Metal Layer SoC Technology in 28 nm CMOS

Abstract: A fractional-N LC-PLL in 28 nm CMOS that uses vertical layout integration techniques to achieve area reduction without performance penalties is proposed. The design utilizes multi-metal layers to vertically integrate dual interposed inductors on top of the active PLL circuit elements, resulting in an area of 0.07 mm 2 . The PLL covers a wide-frequency range from 2.7 GHz to 7 GHz, consuming a total power of 14 mW. At 7 GHz, the RMS jitter is 0.56 ps in integer mode and 1.1 ps in fractional mode.Index Terms-acti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table II shows the performance comparison between stateof-the-art LC-based frequency synthesizers. Our proposed solution is the smallest, except for [41] which occupies almost the same area. Our solution has moderate jitter performance (in general 10 dB worse than high-end solutions), since it was compromised while trading for the area.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table II shows the performance comparison between stateof-the-art LC-based frequency synthesizers. Our proposed solution is the smallest, except for [41] which occupies almost the same area. Our solution has moderate jitter performance (in general 10 dB worse than high-end solutions), since it was compromised while trading for the area.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A comparison of the FoM jitter shows that our RO-based ADPLL is the best in its class and our transformer-based ADPLL provides an additional 11-dB improvement, being comparable in performance to similar-area LC PLLs [13], [41] and only 8-10 dB worse FoM jitter than the best-in-class, but of large-area, wireless (narrow-band) LC PLLs [38], [39]. Moreover, important parameters, such as frequency pushing (not universally reported), which can be translated as frequency sensitivity to its supply, is intrinsically superior in LC tank DCOs (and also in our case) than in any RO-based.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further evaluate the effect of the substrate resistance on the Q-factor of the transformer, a simplified equivalent circuit model shown in Fig. 7(c) [32] is used. 3 The substrate resistance 2R sub pertains to the area underneath the coils.…”
Section: B Special Arrangement Of Native Layer and Its Em Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We surmise that observation would extrapolate to transformers. This reasoning concludes that further area reduction in the transformer-/inductor-dominated TX would only be possible by making the active devices (i.e., the remainder of the constituting components) somehow "disappear" beneath these passives [27]. Naturally, this needs to be done without degrading the precious Q-factor and other performance parameters.…”
Section: A Vertical Layout Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To gain deeper understanding, Fig. 5(a) illustrates the simplified equivalent circuit of the transformer model without the PGS and is compared with that of the transformer model in The overall Q-factor calculation of the transformer's primary winding is given by (2), based on a method in [27]. The secondary winding inductance L s can be analyzed similarly as…”
Section: A Vertical Layout Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%