2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30117-2_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of SRT-Dividers in FPGA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An extensive comparative study of divider implementations on FPGAs, including all kinds of restoring, non-restoring, and SRT dividers has been presented in [1]. It is even possible to implement dividers based on the small embedded 18x18 multiplier blocks [3], [4].…”
Section: Implementation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extensive comparative study of divider implementations on FPGAs, including all kinds of restoring, non-restoring, and SRT dividers has been presented in [1]. It is even possible to implement dividers based on the small embedded 18x18 multiplier blocks [3], [4].…”
Section: Implementation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its advantage lies in simple control logic, but the drawbacks are high computational delay, large area consumption, and the number of iteration cycles. The non-restoring algorithm [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ] adds a certain control logic to the restoring algorithm. Only one subtraction or addition is performed per iteration, and no additional restoring operations are required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its quotient selection logic is more complex. Most embedded processor floating-point units use the SRT algorithm [ 2 , 21 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. The SRT algorithm has different iteration cycles depending on the radix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digit-recurrence algorithm is based on iterative subtraction, including restoring [4], non-restoring [5], and Sweeney-Robertson-Tocher (radix-n SRT) algorithm (SRT is in fact one of non-restoring algorithms) [6]. It works digit by-digit with an iterative-type subtraction and produces a quotient in sequence [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%