2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-011-1113-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of dynamic p-y backbone curves for a single pile in dense sand by 1g shaking table tests

Abstract: A series of 1 g shaking table model pile tests were carried out in dry and saturated dense sand to evaluate dynamic p-y curves for various conditions of the acceleration frequency, the acceleration amplitude of input loads, the flexural stiffness of the pile shaft and the mass at the pile head. The influence of each parameter on dynamic p-y curves was evaluated. Dynamic p-y backbone curves for pseudo static analysis of dense sand were proposed as hyperbolic functions by connecting the peak points of the experi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the basic equations that govern the behavior of soil-structure-fluid systems, Iai [20] derived the scale factors of each engineering property using three independent parameters such as the geometric scale factor (λ), the scale factor for density of soil (λ ρ ), and the scale factor for strain of soil (λ ε ). In this study, little differences of density and strain between the prototype and model were expected, given the relatively small geometry scale factor (λ) of 1.6 used to fabricate the model track system; thus, both λ ρ and λ ε were assumed to be unity (= 1.0) [21][22][23][24]. Consequently, the scale factors of all engineering properties were derived in terms of λ, which are identical to the scale factors for geotechnical application suggested by Gibson [25].…”
Section: Experiments Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the basic equations that govern the behavior of soil-structure-fluid systems, Iai [20] derived the scale factors of each engineering property using three independent parameters such as the geometric scale factor (λ), the scale factor for density of soil (λ ρ ), and the scale factor for strain of soil (λ ε ). In this study, little differences of density and strain between the prototype and model were expected, given the relatively small geometry scale factor (λ) of 1.6 used to fabricate the model track system; thus, both λ ρ and λ ε were assumed to be unity (= 1.0) [21][22][23][24]. Consequently, the scale factors of all engineering properties were derived in terms of λ, which are identical to the scale factors for geotechnical application suggested by Gibson [25].…”
Section: Experiments Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the soil initial modulus was obtained by Hardin and Drnevich (1972) [22] as Equation (2). In the equation below, the values of empirical coefficients A, n were determined through regression analysis for the results of bender element tests which were performed by Yang (2009) [23]. In the regression analysis, G max /F(e)P a and σ m /P a for various test cases were plotted, and characteristic values such as A and n was induced.…”
Section: Dynamic Properties Of Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also stated that the dynamic P-Y curves depend on the loading frequency. In two different experimental studies (Yang et al 2011;Lim and Jeong 2018) on the behavior of single piles under dynamic loads, it is stated that dynamic P-Y curves give very different responses than static curves and the parameters affecting the response are determined by the acceleration amplitude and frequency given to the system (Yang et al 2011;Lim and Jeong 2018), relative stiffness (Lim and Jeong 2018), pile bending stiffness and mass at the pile end (Yang et al 2011). However, no experimental study focusing on the P-Y method has been found in the literature on the behavior of group piles under dynamic loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%