Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam pemberian mut’ah dan nafkah iddah dalam perkara cerai gugat dan bagaimana pelaksanaan isi putusan atas pemberian mut’ah dan nafkah iddah dalam perkara cerai gugat. Metode penelitian pustaka (library research) dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dan yuridis normatif yaitu penelitian hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka atau data sekunder. Teknik pengelolahan data yang digunakan yaitu teknik analisis data deskriptif normatif, dan penarikan kesimpulan dilakukan secara deduktif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan dapat disimpulkan bahwa: 1) Pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam pemberian mut’ah dan nafkah iddah dalam perkara cerai gugat nomor 0076/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Mgl yaitu mendasarkan pada Pasal 41 huruf (c) UU Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 jo Pasal 149 huruf (a) dan (b) KHI serta Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Nomor 137 K/AG/2007 tanggal 6 Februari 2008 dan Nomor 02 K/AG/2002 tanggal 6 Desember 2003. Putusan tersebut menyimpangi ketentuan Pasal 149 KHI, namun demikian pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam perkara tersebut mengandung terobosan hukum dengan metode penemuan hukum dan berpedoman pada Pasal 10 ayat (1) dan Pasal 5 ayat (1) UU Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman dalam memberikan putusan berkaitan dengan nusyuz, sehingga meskipun perceraian diajukan oleh isteri (cerai gugat) tetapi isteri tidak terbukti nusyuz maka secara ex officio suami dapat dihukum untuk memberikan nafkah iddah kepada bekas isterinya. Putusan hakim tersebut mengakodomasi pendapat madzhab Hanafi. Penerapan hak ex officio hakim tersebut juga menyimpangi ketentuan Pasal 178 ayat (3) HIR/ Pasal 189 ayat (3) RBG yang menyatakan bahwa hakim dilarang menjatuhkan keputusan atas perkara yang tidak dituntut, atau memberikan lebih daripada yang dituntut, namun demikian putusan tersebut tidak melanggar asas ultra petita. 2) Pelaksanaan isi putusan perkara nomor 0076/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Mgl adalah secara sukarela di luar persidangan, apabila tergugat tidak melaksanakan isi putusan secara sukarela maka penggugat dapat mengajukan permohonan eksekusi terhadap putusan tersebut dengan mengajukan permohonan eksekusi sejumlah uang. Kelemahan putusan ini yaitu tidak ada instrumen yang dapat memaksa tergugat untuk membayar mut’ah dan nafkah iddah yang telah diputuskan sebagaimana pada perkara cerai talak, instrumen pelaksanaan putusan dalam cerai talak dapat dilaksanakan melalui sidang ikrar talak.
One of the manifestations of the government's alignment with the protection and development of MSMEs is the issuance of Law Number 20 of 2008 concerning Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (UU MSMEs). Protection of MSME products is protection for products consisting of goods and/or services. Every product, both goods and services, has material and immaterial wealth. Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), especially trademarks, are immaterial wealth for MSME products that need legal protection. This study aims to analyze the role of the Kebumen district government in accommodating the registration of MSME product brands. This study uses a normative juridical method with a qualitative approach. The legal materials used in this study include primary and secondary legal materials. Primary legal materials are Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications, Regulation of the Regent of Kebumen Number 71 of 2016 concerning Position, Organizational Structure, Duties and Functions, as well as Work Procedures for the Department of Manpower and Cooperatives, MSME (MSME Kebumen Regent Regulation). Secondary legal materials are journaled articles, law books and websites. The results of the study indicate the role of the Kebumen Regency Government in accommodating trademark registration on MSME products in Kebumen Regency through the KUMKM Service and the KUMKM Integrated Business Service Center (PLUT). Activities carried out are in the form of socialization, consulting services, training, and assistance for MSMEs in trademark registration at the DJKI to protect the law and develop MSMEs.
The purpose of this study is to review the rights of workers to obtain protection, including informal workers, as mandated in Article 3 paragraph (2) of Law Number 32 of 1992 concerning Labor Social Security that every worker has the right to social security of workers. The hazard risk from the work environment owned by informal workers is the same as that of formal workers. So far, the occupational health services provided are still curative, while health care and improvement efforts to improve work and preventive capacity are always neglected. This study uses a juridical empirical research method with a descriptive approach; data collection is done through questionnaires. The research sample includes workers in the home or micro industries both in the Regency and in the City of Magelang. Samples are collected using a nonprobability sampling method, then analyzed using qualitative analysis with inductive methods. Based on the results of the study, the understanding of the SJSN by both employers and informal sector workers is insufficient, but the majority of respondents have a desire to join the SJSN program, with the priority of health insurance and work accident insurance programs. The ability and willingness to become a BPJS participant are influenced by the level of income, and level of education. Current informal sector workers have not been covered by guaranteed protection, both BPJS Kesehatan, and BPJS. The main factor is the non-participation of casual workers in the guarantee of protection due to financial inability to pay contributions. Besides that, it was also because of his ignorance, even though it was not significant. This is due to a lack of socialization from stakeholders regarding the importance of health and safety guarantees and protection for workers and their families in addition to regulations that also do not accommodate informal workers.
This study aims to determine the Islamic view of IPR as a waqf object, and procedures for implementing waqf with IPR objects. This study uses a normative juridical method with an approach to the Law and conceptual approach. The results showed that IPR was seen as one of the wealth rights (Huquq Maliyyah) in the view of Islam that received legal protection as other assets, so that IPR could be used as an object of waqf (al-mauqud 'alaih) both exchange contracts, commercial (Mu'awadhah ) and non-commercial contracts (tabarru'at). IPR as a waqf object is permitted by Islamic law as long as it fulfills the requirements as an object of waqf, as well as positive Indonesian law, this is reinforced by Law No. 41 of 2004 concerning Endowments; Government Regulation No. 42 of 2006; The decision of the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) No. 1 MUNAS / VII / 5/2005, allows IPR as an object of waqf. The HKI waqf procedure, in general, is not much different from the waqf procedure with objects of immovable objects such as land or other immovable objects but the difference is that there must be authentic evidence from the Directorate General of Islamic Education and the establishment of court states that the waqf object is not in dispute. Before the waqf pledge was made the Acting Actor of the Pledge of Endowments (PPAIW) consulted the Ministry of Religion in advance to get recommendations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.