1999
DOI: 10.1063/1.124301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: “Suppressed diffusion of boron and carbon in carbon-rich silicon” [Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 1682 (1998)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the surface region (0-25 nm depth), a slight broadening of the indium profile is observed compared to the as-implanted profile. This is likely due to the absence of carbon on the surface region and that previous work has shown that the diffusion suppression of carbon is localized phenomenon [6]. Between the increasing temperatures of 650-800 -C, the indium profile at the tail end remains stationary (between 90 and 200 nm depth); indicating that indium TED is suppressed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…At the surface region (0-25 nm depth), a slight broadening of the indium profile is observed compared to the as-implanted profile. This is likely due to the absence of carbon on the surface region and that previous work has shown that the diffusion suppression of carbon is localized phenomenon [6]. Between the increasing temperatures of 650-800 -C, the indium profile at the tail end remains stationary (between 90 and 200 nm depth); indicating that indium TED is suppressed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This phenomenon is similar to the suppression of boron diffusion by C [10]. The presence of C along the NiSi grain boundaries may also hinder the diffusion of Al towards the NiSi/Si interface [ Fig.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 82%
“…After annealing, the SIMS profiles clearly show the reduction of B diffusion in the C region. It has to be noted that, after the initial publication by Rücker et al it turned out that the C concentration had been overestimated by a factor 2 (top C concentration of 5 × 10 19 cm −3 instead of 1 × 10 20 cm −3 ) [4]. Taking this into account, we have performed simulations of these experiments.…”
Section: Boronmentioning
confidence: 99%