2019
DOI: 10.1177/0084672419878824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relation between religiosity dimensions and support for interreligious conflict in Indonesia

Abstract: In this study, we explain differences in support for interreligious lawful and violent protests against the religious outgroup. Combining religiosity and social identity approaches, we take three dimensions of religiosity (namely, practices, beliefs and salience) into consideration related to support for interreligious conflict, next to relevant control characteristics. The analysis is based on survey data ( N = 2026) collected among a random sample of Muslims ( n = 1451) and Christians ( n = 575) acr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, religious adherents can be touched by their "religiosity," not only to emphasize having their religion. Third, the dimension of orthodox spirituality is more pronounced promising and challenging and not just focused on the outward aspects of religious institutional formality (Abdullah, 2004;Setiawan et al, 2020).…”
Section: Formulating a Cross-understanding And Collective Agreementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, religious adherents can be touched by their "religiosity," not only to emphasize having their religion. Third, the dimension of orthodox spirituality is more pronounced promising and challenging and not just focused on the outward aspects of religious institutional formality (Abdullah, 2004;Setiawan et al, 2020).…”
Section: Formulating a Cross-understanding And Collective Agreementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second study is related to multiculturalism (Kusuma & Susilo, 2020) (Masudi, 2019) (Baidhawy, 2010). The third study relates to patterns between religions (Tostes, 2020) (Setiawan, De Jong, Scheepers, & Sterkens, 2019). The three tendencies to study religious harmony with religious symbols see harmony in terms of religious dogma, multiculturalism, and inter-religious patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the main reason is that the type of group identity involved in interreligious competition and conflict, namely religious identity, is not merely about religious beliefs. It also refers to one's social position (Ysseldyk et al 2010;Setiawan et al 2020). By identifying with a particular identity, individuals naturally conceive their ingroup vis-à-vis the relevant outgroup(s) in terms of their size, i.e., majority vs. minority, as well as their power, i.e., dominant vs. subordinate (Blumer 1958;Bobo 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This partly explains the emergence of religious fundamentalism or extremism, e.g., ISIS (Herriot 2014;Beller and Kröger 2017). On the other hand, embracing religious identity also brings about positive consequences, such as caring for the poor and loving one's neighbours (Setiawan et al 2020;Glas et al 2018). Therefore, it reinforces the need to investigate the potential difference of play between each religiosity dimension on one hand and memory of conflict and perceived threat on the other, which in turn, impacts individuals' attitudes towards interreligious conflicts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation